Allied with this posture of self-reverence are other distinctive attitudes that distinguish the bearing of the higher man. By contrast, they saw those who were weak, unhealthy, and enslaved as "bad," since their weakness was undesirable.
A will that wishes to remain free will shun absolutes of all kinds and try to look at a matter from as many different perspectives as possible in order to gain its own. The book is considered by some Nietzsche scholars to be a work of sustained brilliance and power as well as his masterpiece.
The resentment which otherwise might have gone out into the world and done harm is thus turned inward upon the sick man. All ascetic philosophers in their aerial asceticism are willing to practice a certain amount of renunciation for the sake of their pure and unruffled contemplation, but they are not unbiased witnesses since they think only of themselves.
Punishment was cruel but cheerful: Nietzsche sees it as the expression of a weak, sick will. Even if there is no shortage in the history of art and literature of cases of immense suffering being the spur to great creativity, there remains a serious worry about the logic of this line of Nietzschean critique.
The memory of such things was supposed to make people "reasonable" and fix within them the dreary affair called reflection, or conscience. The primeval problem of human responsibility was not solved in any delicate but in a frightful way so that it might be burned into the memory.
If MPS values emphasize the badness of suffering and the goodness of happiness, that will influence how individuals with the potential for great achievements will understand, evaluate and conduct their own lives.
Nietzsche sees it as the expression of a weak, sick will.
Nietzsche suggests that asceticism enhances the feeling of power by giving a person complete control over him- or herself. Three other general textual considerations count against attributing the strong doctrine of the will to power to Nietzsche.
Note, of course, that the Millian Model argument as formulated so far would show only that power is what is non-morally valuable or good for an agent. It is essentially to allow oneself to be dominated by a particular will. Second, the view at issue presupposes an unusually strong doctrine of the will to power: One of the key tenets of his philosophy work of sustained brilliance and power as well as his masterpiece.
Schopenhauer, following Immanuel Kant, looked upon the beauty of art as that which pleases us without our having any interest in it, and it was the "disinterested" that both these philosophers exalted as the very essence of beauty.Friedrich Nietzsche is one of the most inﬂuential thinkers of the past years and On the Genealogy of Morality () is his most important work on ethics and politics.
On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic (Genealogy of Morals) is an book by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. It consists of a preface and three interrelated essays that expand and follow through on concepts Nietzsche sketched out in Beyond Good and Evil ().4/5(55).
Nietzsche's moral philosophy is primarily critical in orientation: he attacks morality both for its commitment to untenable descriptive (metaphysical and empirical) claims about human agency, as well as for the deleterious impact of its distinctive norms and values on the flourishing of the highest types of human beings (Nietzsche's “higher men”).
On the Genealogy of Morality, or On the Genealogy of Morals (German: Zur Genealogie der Moral), subtitled A Polemic (Eine Streitschrift), is a book by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, composed and first published in with the intention of expanding and following through on certain new doctrines sketched out in his previous book.
39 quotes from On the Genealogy of Morals: ‘We are unknown to ourselves, we men of knowledge - and with good reason.
― Friedrich Nietzsche, A Genealogia da Moral. 2 likes. Like ― Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality. tags: mortality, nietzsche, philosophy.
2 likes. Like. On The Genealogy of Morals is made up of three essays, all of which question and critique the value of our moral judgments based on a genealogical method whereby Nietzsche examines the origins and meanings of our different moral concepts/5.Download