However, only one person casts a vote because that person is the only one certain of one specific theory. Compulsory voting is wrong and should not be forced on anyone.
Many individuals claim that voting is a civic duty shared by all who live under one government, but this is not the case. For this reason, arguments in favor demand the enforcement of compulsory voting to ensure full participation for fair elections.
Because they could not choose, they decided to leave the decision up to one voter who was sure of one theory. For this reason, many individuals choose not to vote because they are uncertain of their choices or harbor equal faith for all parties on the ballot.
When voting is mandated by a government and every legal individual turns in a vote, this ensures that the government has a solid number to work with. The arguments for compulsory voting state that there cannot be a fair election if groups of people fail to cast their ballots.
The occupants of the lifeboat decide that because the situation is so dire, everyone should have the right to vote on a theory.
Both sides strive for acceptance, each claiming to outweigh the other, but before casting judgment on either side of the argument, it is important to understand the most prominent pros and cons of each to decide why compulsory voting would do more harm than good.
These same individuals claim that voters who do not participate muddle the voting pool because the number of individuals who did not participate could have swayed the outcome of the election in another direction. Had the other occupants of the lifeboat given empty, compulsory votes, they could have made a decision under pressure that led to their demise.
If none of them were sure, they could not say with certainty who had their votes. However, the arguments against compulsory voting cite this as the same reason that voting should be voluntary. If the other occupants of the lifeboat were forced to cast votes for their preferred theories, they would have given empty votes.
Voting is a personal choice made by individuals who strongly believe in the parties they vote for. By having those figures available, the government will know for sure exactly how many votes each party has acquired for the election, leaving no room for error in the event of undecided voters.
Votes should be cast by individuals who strongly believe in the people they vote for, not by individuals who vote because they have no other choice. Many individuals say that this leads to a more fair election process because everyone has submitted an opinion for consideration.
Voting is a right, not a duty, and the only votes that carry any weight are the votes cast by confident voters who stand behind their decisions. One of the most popular theories in the argument against compulsory voting is the lifeboat theory. The arguments against claim that forcing individuals to cast ballots against their will can lead to empty votes, or donkey votes.
Why Compulsory Voting is Wrong Many arguments exist to prove or disprove the importance of compulsory voting.Forty five out of the 50 countries demonstrating a high voter turnout used voluntary voting.
Other countries with compulsory voting have the lowest voter turnout in the world such as Egypt which only has a percent voter turnout, the second lowest in the world (IDEA ).
Compulsory voting cannot be equated to active citizenship. Finally the compulsory voting makes no sense if a lower voter apathy is the only reason. Politicians should think about the reasons for the low turnout and not about the low turnout itself.
If the population is unsatisfied with the dominating political situation, the politicians should think about their policies at first and not about how to.
Should voting be compulsory in Australia? Compulsory voting was introduced in Australia in after the voter turnout of those registered to vote in Australia was as low as 47%. Since voting was made compulsory by the Federal Government, voter turnout has remained around %.
Should Voting Be Mandatory Voting is not just a right, it is also a responsibility of an individual during the elections. Voting ensures people that people learn about their position with respect to issues which are critically. The position adopted in this essay is that voting in elections should not be compulsory.
Australia is one of at least twenty countries which compel their citizens to vote in Federal, State and most Local government elections. Australia forced its compulsory voting (CV) laws on its citizens in. Compulsory voting in a democratic society is undeniably a controversial topic as it raises a question: how democratic a nation will be with or without compulsory voting.
This system has many benefits to the nation if it is implemented in a right manner. In this essay, we will discuss the nature of democracy with few examples of compulsory voting.Download